Charles Dickens. If ever Charles Dickens was to be assigned to a season, it would be winter, Christmas, specifically. Tiny Tim, Ebenezer Scrooge, 3 ghosts… is there anyone in the world who doesn’t know this story? Perhaps I should have read A Christmas Carol but Bleak House was gifted to me so Bleak House, I read.
I finished Bleak House a few weeks ago but deliberately delayed posting my review, brief though my reviews invariably are. Why? Because the last Dickens I read annoyed me, was far too dragged out and frankly, I found it predictable and boring. I wanted to give Dickens a chance, to give it a fresh go and a second shot at winning me around. After taking a bit more time to ponder the book, its storyline, the writing, etc, this is what I thought.
The writing: Dickens’ writing – his style, his use of language and his descriptive abilities are wonderful and at times, truly awesome. The book alone is worth reading for the many moments that he just captures so accurately and eloquently. If you are a lawyer, his description of legal life in chambers and around the courts is particularly enjoyable and is a particular point of focus in the book.
The story: I’ve read better. I would still take Thomas Hardy over Dickens. I remain open to being converted on this preference but having now read two Dickens novels and 3 Hardy novels, my own opinion is that Hardy’s stories are just more interesting, more compelling and well, better.
As ever, I will refrain from synopsising the novel so as not to spoil it for anyone who has not yet read it but just to give you an idea of what the book is about… The protagonist in the story is Esther, whom we meet as a young girl, who doesn’t know her parents and is being raised by a hard woman. Esther’s upbringing is sad and she’s made to feel unimportant and is frequently reminded that she was “her mother’s shame.” When this lady dies, Esther mysteriously becomes the charge of a wealthy man, who initially sends her to a good school and then brings her to live in his salubrious home at Bleak House, her lot having improved substantially. The story follows Esther and her new companions in her new life and ultimately unravels the mystery of her origins.
There are, of course, lots of sub-plots going on in the novel, lots of characters and lots to keep up with here. You have to pay attention. It’s not quite Tolstoy in its complexity and numeracy of characters, but it’s not Mr Men either. Some of these periphery characters are interesting in their own rite, some are not.
The bottom line: It’s far too long. Biblically long and without need. The story is not that complex nor that interesting. He did this in A Tale of Two Cities too. I didn’t appreciate it then and I didn’t appreciate it this time either.
Dickens’ abilities as a writer are beyond doubt, but you do get the feeling, as I did in A Tale of Two Cities, that the actual story is simply a canvas for his descriptions, constantly playing second fiddle to lyricism, and being relegated to a status of lesser importance. Finishing the book, as I did A Tale, I felt that this was a pity, that he couldn’t make more out of the story given his talented way with words. At the end of the day, I’m reading to be entertained and if the story isn’t entertaining me, then I’m going to look for my entertainment elsewhere. For what it’s worth, I think all of the Bronte sister’s books are also far better. I’ll put it this way: If I had to choose, no competition.
To sum up, I thought BH was better than A Tale of Two Cities but still not great. I wouldn’t read it again and it won’t be going anywhere on my list of favourite books.
I am not a Dickens’ expert nor am I a literary scholar of any description. I am a reader and book lover, and these are my views.
Have you read Bleak House? What did you think?
What do you think of Charles Dickens?